Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Counterfeit Drug Legislation Stalls in Court

Passed by Congress in 1987 and signed into law in 1988, critical portions of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act are still not in effect. Specifically, those parts that deal with certain drug wholesalers maintaining a "pedigree" for the drugs they trade. But the FDA had finally decided after all these years that December 1st of this year would be the magic day.

I discussed some of this back on December 1st when some secondary wholesalers -- those that are not "authorized" wholesalers, for whom the strict pedigree provisions don't apply --had obtained temporary relief in court preventing the PDMA from finally being implemented . This is important because accurately tracking the pedigree (or chain of custody) of a drug is a major way to keep control of the supply chain. This is critical to making sure counterfeit drugs don't leak into our regular drug channels, and thereby into your local pharmacy.

Now a federal judge has ruled on this in favor of the secondary wholesalers, thereby staying the provisions of the law. Since two blogs have already covered this, I won't re-invent the wheel and will direct you to them:

Both Juvan's Health Law Update and Adam Fein's Drug Channels had long discussions on the issues in their blogs on December 10th.

--ET

Labels: counterfeit drugs

posted by Eric Turkewitz
Permanent Link

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.