Waiver of Claims, Before Negligent Act, Is Not A Bar To Lawsuit

In medical malpractice cases a person often signs a waiver of any claims when they agree to undergo surgery, at the same time they sign a consent. In the medical malpractice setting, this is usually one of a batch of forms shoved in front of a patient before surgery that few people even read. So the question becomes, does signing such a waiver prevent a lawsuit from being brought based on negligent conduct?
The short answer is no. New York, as well as other states, has long held that such an agreement to waive a claim of negligence is against public policy. And if the agreement is against public policy, the court won’t try to enforce it. One can not simply have a person waive a claim to future acts of negligence.
However, if a waiver is drafted smartly by a defendant it will describe various injuries or events that can happen during surgery, as part of the consent. If this is done it makes it easier for the defendant as they can point to the waiver form and claim that the person knew this was a risk of the event.
The question here is not whether the risk was known, but rather, whether due care used to avoid that known risk.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Must Someone Be Negligent In Head-On Collision?
  2. Stable May Be Liable for Negligent Assignment of Horse
  3. New York City Reports Lowest Number of Claims In 10 Years
  4. New York Cleans Up Claims Act
  5. Texas Judge Dismisses Vioxx Claims

Tags:

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.