A Response to Justice Scalia on Bush v. Gore
In handling a Bush v. Gore question from the audience at Iona College the other day, Justice Scalia said:
“It’s water over the deck — get over it”
But the suspension of democracy in Florida in 2000 is not something to “get over” any more than other poorly decided Supreme Court decisions such as:
- Plessy v. Ferguson’s holding that “separate but equal” race discrimination was OK, or the
- Dred Scot decision holding that slaves could not sue in federal court since no slave or descendant of a slave could be a U.S. citizen, or
- Korematsu v. United States, holding that U.S. citizens of Japanese ancestry citizens could be summarily relocated to detention camps during WW II based solely on their race.
In fact, Bush v. Gore was worse than all three. For each decision above could be overturned by the voters either in Congress or by constitutional amendment. But since Bush v. Gore dealt with the actual disenfranchisement of voters, it could not. All legally cast ballots should have been counted.
Bad judicial decisions are not something to “get over,” but are mistakes to be learned from.
The New York
Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The
Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising
in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR
1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you
can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the
blog in any way.
blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases
from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different,
and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember
that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar
outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer
or law firm may be retained.
Some of the
commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply
wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative,
and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of
his or her own choosing for advice.
are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.