Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #6 (Constitutional Construction)

You can’t swing a dead cat these days without hitting a Supreme Court Justice in the media spotlight:

A-List legal blogs are red hot on a new book, Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court,. In addition, interviews have come from Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice John Paul Stevens (ABC News) Justice Antonin “Get Over It” Scalia (Iona College), Justices Ginsburg (CBS 60 Minutes), Justice Alito, (Palm Beach Bar Association) and Justice Breyer (Fox News Sunday). Whew.

There is also a PBS special coming up next week.

According to Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy, “These days it feels like news when Supreme Court Justices aren’t giving on-the-record interviews to reporters.”

All of which leads to constitutional debate since many judges prefer to talk of judicial philosophy instead of individual cases: Some feel the constitution should be interpreted based on the current times and circumstances while others assert that it must be strictly interpreted as written.

This debate being played out now in various media brings up an ancient quote:

Rigorous law is often rigorous injustice.

–Terence (185 B.C – 159 B.C.)
Roman playwright and poet

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #1 (Ignorance of the Law)
  2. Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #4 (Trial By Jury)
  3. Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #5 (On Courts)
  4. Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #3 (Courage)
  5. Quotes on the Law and Lawyers #2 (Inequities of Bad Law)

Tags:

January 29, 2007 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.