Farting In The Courthouse

(This has nothing whatsoever to do with New York personal injury law)

There are two types of families in this world: Those for whom passing gas is a matter of some discretion, and those for whom it is an Olympic sport.

Those in the latter group are no doubt the target audience for Pull My Finger Fred and Fartman, both of whom are plush dolls that make a variety of sounds and comments (that’s Fred, I think, to the right).

They have something else in common too, both were memorialized today in an opinion from the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Seems they had issues of copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and unfair competition.

From Circuit Judge Diane Wood:

Somewhat to our surprise, it turns out that there is a niche market for farting dolls, and it is quite lucrative.

The decision is here: JCW Investments v. Novelty, Inc. (a/k/a Pull My Finger Fred v. Fartman)

More details from this 2004 blog post on the dispute at the Berkely Intellectual Property Weblog.

Briefs are here.

(hat tip to How Appealing)

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Across from the Courthouse
  2. Heard in the Courthouse (7/22/09)
  3. The Worst Courthouse in America?
  4. Client Privacy and the Courthouse File
  5. Professionalism (Or Lack Thereof) In The Courthouse. And A Solution

Tags:

March 20, 2007 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.