New York Personal Injury Law Blog: Counterfeit Drugs Update - Trying to Track The Goods

Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY  

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

 

Counterfeit Drugs Update - Trying to Track The Goods


A few other blogs have noted developments on the continuing story of how counterfeit drugs enter our pharmaceutical supply chain that are worth noting:

Adam Fein at Drug Channels in RFID Un-Hype covers the failure of the drug industry to embrace radio frequency identity tags as a means of tracking drugs as they wind their way through an often extended supply chain. The extended supply chain is safety weakness as it increases the chances for counterfeit infiltration. The subject is also covered by Ed Silverman at Pharmalot as he notes that the much ballyhooed RFID as a solution to tracking drugs in the supply chain appears dead in the water.

The failure of RFID comes as no surprise to me. When I previously spoke before the FDA's Counterfeit Drug Task Force a few years back, I urged non-technology solutions. The remedy for a weak supply chain is to actually limit the number of hands the drugs pass through, not try to document a dozen different owners of the drugs. The more people that touch the drug, the greater the chance for infiltration of counterfeits (or destruction of the drug through negligent handling). Counterfeiters will always be around to try and corrupt the supply chain, for as Willy Sutton might have said, that's where the money is. One day, some distributor that bought mystery medicine out of the gray market will be looking at dead bodies and trying to feign ignorance of the problem.

And on a related note, Jayne Juvan (Juvan's Health Law Update), reports on an appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Rx USA Wholesale v. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. This dealt with an injunction against the FDA forcing compliance with the rules regarding the drug pedigrees (that's the track of the actual drugs, discussed above). The FDA has now filed its brief, and Jayne has a copy of it along with a synopsis.

See also from this blog (with yet more links) :

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

 


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog does not accept advertising banners, pop up ads or other distractions from its content. But since The Turkewitz Law Firm is the sole sponsor, it may be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.)

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?