More Doctors Encouraged To Say "I’m Sorry"

A bill being considered by Rhode Island could mean they will join the ranks of other states that encourage doctors to apologize for mistakes. The story is here.

I’ve always believed, based on the manner in which calls come in to my office, that poor communication (bad bedside manner) is the primary reason patients call attorneys. They are angry, or confused, or both.

Which is why I found this particular quote at the end of the article really interesting…an insurance company that encourages more of the same thing that has gotten docs into trouble in the past…

Boston-based ProMutual Group, which insures 18,000 doctors, dentists and health care facilities in the Northeast, warns its clients against apologies that admit guilt — even in states that have laws protecting doctors who say they are sorry.

It distributes a tip sheet cautioning doctors against uttering the words “error,” “mistake,” “fault” or “negligence.”

“We encourage physicians to apologize about the outcome, not necessarily for any error that may have occurred,” ProMutual spokeswoman Nina Akerley said. “Apology is not about confession.”

Some folks never learn.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Doctors Refusing to Treat Lawyers (Is The White Coat of Silence Intensifying?) (Updated)
  2. Will NY Doctors Be Hit With $50,000 Surcharge?
  3. Doctors Are Still Tops in Pay (But Complain About Malpractice Premiums Anyway)
  4. Medical Malpractice Insurers Price-Gouged Doctors During This Decade
  5. New York’s No-Fault Mess (Do Our Judges Want Doctors To Go To Law School?)

Tags:

April 11, 2007 · 1 Comment ·

One Response Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.