![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Wednesday, July 18, 2007Your Bar Exam Answer Sheet Is Gone -- Now What? My bar exam responses were lost. Not all of them, mind you, just the 200 multi-state multiple choice answers I scored on that computer sheet with a pencil. It was July 1985 and the place was a passenger ship terminal on Manhattan's west side. I was one of 500+ people who got the bad news a few weeks afterward. The answer sheets just disappeared. As in gone. Vanished. The crime (or act of negligence) was never solved. The answer sheets were never recovered from the Hudson River or local garbage dump, wherever it is they went.With newly graduated law students preparing for next week's test, and the folks at Above the Law asking for bar exam anecdotes, I thought I would share mine. I found out about the missing answer sheets while backpacking around Europe, a reprieve from law school and the stress of the exam. My buddy Murphy had been told, when he called his folks, "Tell Eric to call home right away. It's important." I was relieved to hear that the problem was only the bar exam that I had slaved over. I was given four choices:
A week after making my choice, I called home again and found out from my dad that my question booklet had been found. Not the answer sheets, just the booklet. And in the booklet I had circled answers before transferring them to the answer sheets. Why mark up my booklet? Because when I took the exam 22 summers ago, I had listened to my bar review prep guy, John Pieper, who had told us that, to save time, we should answer the questions 10 at a time and then transfer the answers over. So the bar reviewers looked at my booklet and could figure out 194 of my 200 answers. I was then offered a fifth option: Did I want them to score up a new answer sheet for me? Which meant that I started off with six wrong. (I later learned that this option was given to about two dozen people, if the examiners could figure out 180 or more answers from the booklets.) That day I called home and was given this choice, I had gone summer-skiing in Zermatt. On a glacier. With a perfect view of the Matterhorn off to my left. And I was relaxing afterward with a cold beer. Coming home early to re-study didn't, for some reason, really appeal to me. Dad, I said, let's do it. And that's how I passed the bar exam. (Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York, receiving the good news on the bar results in December 1985 and being sworn in on the 25th day of February, 1986 in the Eastern District of New York) Labels: Odds and Ends
Comments:
Yup. David Lat at Above the Law caught the error and I fixed it, along with a couple other minor things.
--ET
I remember it well. Those of us who were assigned to Pier 90 were the ones affected. Those who took the exam in Pier 92 (the large majority, by the way) were not. I opted to take the multi-state exam in September, even though it was given on the day immediately after one of the High Holidays. The other point I remember is that Pieper gave us a FREE three day session to prep for the multi-state again. And that's how I passed the multi-state.
Post a Comment
Links to this post: << Home
The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way. Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained. Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice. Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.
|
Subscribe by Email
|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
An Affiliate of the Law.com Network
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
Copyright © 2007 Eric Turkewitz & The Turkewitz Law Firm
About the New York Personal Injury Law Blog:
An attorney's blog on New York personal injury law,
medical malpractice, the civil justice system
and cases of interest.
|
|
Design by Lidija Tomas Design / Studio 4D |