New York Personal Injury Law Blog: New York Personal Injury Attorney Probe Catches Another Ambulance Chaser

Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY  

Thursday, August 2, 2007

 

New York Personal Injury Attorney Probe Catches Another Ambulance Chaser

A Manhattan District Attorney investigation into ambulance chasing has yielded its 11th attorney conviction. The probe, ongoing since 1999, involves a "runner" bribing hospital officials for the names of patients and then selling them to corrupt attorneys for $500, according to this New York Law Journal article.

The attorneys who bought the names have been convicted of a felony for filing a false statement, and disbarred. The filed document is a "Retainer Statement" that New York personal injury attorneys must furnish to the Office of Court Administration that sets forth the terms of the contingency arrangement, and also mandates that the attorney set forth how the law firm was found by the client. A subsequent filing must be made at the end of representation detailing exactly what happened to the proceeds (if any) of a matter taken on contingency.

My opinion:
I am of mixed feelings on seeing this. On the one hand, it is a continuing embarrassment to the profession to see this conduct happen. The image of all attorneys, and those who practice personal injury law in particular, are further smeared leaving a sour taste in the mouths of the public.

On the other hand, and far more importantly, I know this crap happens and I want it stopped. I have heard it through the grapevine as new clients reported on how they were approached by others after being hospitalized. It is utterly infuriating, and I am pleased that the Manhattan District Attorney is working on the issue. I have often quietly hoped (and today, not so quietly) that District Attorneys in the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island would follow suit, not only investigating based on tips they receive, but even running sting operations.

Seven other now-convicted New York attorneys were listed in the article for using the runner (Jean Phillipe Landi) named in the article:
In addition, two other attorneys uncovered in this probe had previously been convicted of stealing from clients, Michael Mann and Joshua Just (Mann & Just). The conviction was based on charging clients for expenses such as medical reports that had never been incurred. I had previously covered that here: Two Personal Injury Lawyers Sentenced in Billing Scam.

Addendum:
We strongly urge not only enforcement, but also outreach by the disciplinary committees to [the Office of Court Administration] itself and/or other State agencies for the resources needed to address what may be the most extraordinarily offensive variety of client solicitation. They must undertake the investigative efforts necessary to identify and prosecute those attorneys and hospital employees who are responsible for inserting "runners" into hospitals to solicit clients at their bedsides. Currently, the "don't ask, don't tell" approach effectively encourages wrongdoers. Our membership believes that hospitals are in a unique position to stop this practice and that it is in the best interests of their patients to do so.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

 


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?