Bill Clinton Threatens Action Over Chelsea Photo in Restaurant

If a celebrity’s photograph with a restaurant owner hangs in the window of the eatery without the individual’s permission, is it an unauthorized commercial use of the image? Yes, according to former President Bill Clinton, who has demanded that a photograph of his daughter with the owner, that has been hanging in the window of Osso Buco for five years, be taken down. Clinton’s attorney has written on official William Jefferson Clinton letterhead, “We reserve the right to exercise any and all options available to us if you refuse to comply.”

The letter goes on to say:

“Ms. Clinton, a private citizen, was not consulted prior to this picture being displayed, and thus, her permission was not given for you to do so. While she may have dined at your restaurant, this does not serve as an endorsement. We ask that you immediately remove that picture and any and all pictures displaying Ms. Clinton.”

This type of suit isn’t my bailiwick, but so I sure would be interested in knowing what the actual answer is.

I would add, of course, that a simple request from the frequent customer, Chelsea, should have accomplished this goal.

Addendum: Bill Clinton “Counselor” Not A Licensed New York Attorney

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Bill Clinton "Counselor" Is Not Licensed New York Attorney
  2. My Dinner With Bill Clinton
  3. New York’s Chief Judge Threatens To Sue For Pay Raises
  4. Linkworthy (With A Bush/Clinton Bonus)
  5. The Bill of Rights and John Peter Zenger (Updated)

Tags:

September 26, 2007 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.