Two Blogs, Almost Identical Names

It had to come up eventually: Two blogs with almost idential names, and the issue of what intellectual property rights bloggers have to those names.

Here they are:
The Angry Pharmacist (started two years ago); and
The Angriest Pharmacist (started seven months ago).

Needless to say, Angry is not too pleased with Angriest, who concedes, “I did happen upon his site and loved it…so, I semi-jacked the name.”

The original is (can you guess?) angry about the poaching of his or her name.

Complicating the issue for The Original Angry is that he uses a pseudonym. Assuming he could find out who Angriest is and bring a suit, how can he ever prove he was damaged?

Now intellectual property is not my long suit, but I am curious since the same thing can (and most likely will) happen in the legal blogosphere eventually, where use of real names is the norm. After all, there are about 1,000 legal blogs but about 1,000,000 lawyers in the country, and the future blawgosphere (for us less talented people who can’t create pithy names) could look something like this:

The Podunk Criminal Law Blog;
The Podunk Criminal Blog;
The Podunk Criminal Law Blawg;
The Podunk Criminal Law Legal Blog.

I toss this out there with the hope that someone, somewhere, might have a few thoughts on this…

(Hat tip to Monkey Girl).

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Two More Angry Medical Bloggers With Similar Names
  2. Personal Injury Blogs Make ABA List of Top 100 Blogs
  3. FindLaw — How Low Can They Go? (Stealing Blog Names)
  4. ABA Blawg 100…And the rise of the personal injury law blogs
  5. Five Blogs and Five Lawyers

Tags:

September 6, 2007 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.