A Personal Injury Law Rorschach Test: Bonaduce v. "Fairplay"

How many lawsuits to you see where the entire incident is captured on film, in front of a studio audience? Former child star Danny Bonaduce has been sued by former Survivor contestant Jon “Johnny Fairplay” Dalton after he was dumped over the shoulder onto his face at an awards show.

The altercation happened last week at the FOX Reality Really Channel awards, which I oddly seem to have missed.

So, is it Dalton’s fault for initially jumping on Bonaduce?

Or Bonaduce’s fault for dumping Dalton over his shoulder?

Or is this a classic case of trying to apportion fault among both participants, and if so, what percent fault for each?

The clip you see here is less than a minute. You decide.

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)

Links to this post:

all’s fairplay in love and reality tv
dustin recently showed you the clip of danny bonaduce laying some broken-face on reality star leech johnny fairplay. following up on that story, fairplay (real name – jon dalton) has decided to sue bonaduce, along with the fox reality
posted by Seth @ October 15, 2007 8:55 AM


2 Responses Leave a comment

  • Scott J. Kreppein 2007.10.10 at 13:52 | Quote

    I think if you decide to jump on Danny Bonaduce, it’s akin to primary assumption of risk, like a sporting event. The same would probably be true for Chris Knight, to a lesser degree. Had he jumped on a non-violent reality t.v. star, it might be a different story, but here the risk of being toppled on his head was completely foreseeable.

  • Kia 2007.10.10 at 18:16 | Quote

    wow… was he gyrating while on danny? that could constitute sexual assault, in which case danny was simply defending himself.

    anyway they should film the entire trial process as well. that would make for great t.v.

Comments are closed.

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.