Dennis Quaid’s Newborn Twins Victimized by Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice can happen to anyone. And last week while we celebrated Thanksgiving, actor Dennis Quaid was running back and forth to the hospital because it happened to his two-week old twins when they received a massive overdose of a drug. And it happened at the well-regarded Cedars-Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles.

Now the kids will hopefully be OK despite this, as the overdose was realized and an antidote given. But it’s a good lesson on how to make improvements in the mechanic of how hospitals work and how drug companies package their products. If only people would listen.

The kids had IV lines flushed with Heparin, a blood thinner. They were supposed to be flushed with an infant’s dose of 10 units/ml. But they got an adult’s dose of 10,000u/ml instead. So they received a 1,000x overdose. Oops.

And worse yet, the hospital had previously been warned by the FDA of the potential for mix ups between these two doses.

Here are the questions for the hospital and the drug manufacturer:

What were the adult strength drugs doing in the neonatal unit?
Why do the bottles look the same?
Why weren’t there precautions in place to separate out different dosages?
Why were FDA warnings ignored?

At EverythingHealth (via Grand Rounds at Prudence), Dr. Toni Brayer writes:

The way to prevent these errors and “near-misses” is to put processes into place in health care like we do in aviation safety. Make it hard to do the wrong thing. Labels should have “red alerts” to show different strengths. The background colors on the bottles should be different and the font size needs to be increased. Look alike drug names should be differentiated by using TALL LETTERS. (glipIZIDE vs. glyBURIDE). The bottles should look completely different so it is obvious to every care giver…whether stocking a med cart or administering a medication.

If you think this is a rare occurrence, think again: Each year there are over 1.5 million medication errors in the United States, and as many as 7,000 people will die from them. And our children are the most likely victims (see: Children Are Most Likely Victims of Surgical Medication Errors).

But sometimes, it takes celebrity misfortune to bring home the reality of the problem.

For more:

(Eric Turkewitz is a personal injury attorney in New York)
——————————————————————————-
Update (12/4/07): Dennis Quaid Sues Baxter Healthcare Over Heparin Label Mixup for Twins

Tags:

2 Responses Leave a comment

  • Anonymous 2007.12.5 at 19:17 | Quote

    I salute the Quaid Family for going to the Pharmaceutical company instead of the Hospital . I have been a nurse for 30 yrs and the packaging and marketing of drugs DO NOT put patients safety as their focus But PUT themselves as the focus and their pockets $$$$$… With the national Nursing shortage and the all might buck as the end .. It is amazing that this does not happen more .. I am the Director of Emergency services in 1 of the largest hospitals in MASS and the nurses I work with are the best and most compassionate I have worked with but.. the RED tape and the Joint Commission is making every aspect of nursing painful!! and unsafe instead of safer.. God Bless the Quaid twins and all others that have good outcomes from errors… But these errors need not occur if we are all on the same page like we used to be ,..

  • carol annie 2010.10.19 at 03:34 | Quote

    I agree with what you saying but I aslo had a daughter in Cedars Sinai hospital. She was victum of medication and administration of medication errors not because of labeling but because nursing staff could not read the labels correctly. I am also an RN and thank the lord I was at my daughters bedside to catch their errors( all the while arguing with me that I was wrong) i am glad the Quaid twins along with my daughter were not casualties of such incompetence.

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.