Vote For Me In Blawg 100!! (Oh Wait, You Can’t)

I’d like to tell you to vote for me in the latest law blog popularity contest. After all, it’s being run by the ABA Journal so it has to be prestigious, right?

But I can’t tell you that. Because I wasn’t nominated. Nor, for that matter, was any other law blog devoted to personal injury law.

Maybe personal injury blogs all stink? Maybe we don’t discuss enough law, or have enough visitors? Perhaps all the blogs are poorly written? I mean every last one. Perhaps the bloggers really aren’t worthy of mention? How else can an entire field of law be ignored?

So let’s take a short look:

You would think that, with so much noise being made about the need for tort “reform” because personal injury suits are so problematic, there would be at least a few blogs devoted to that subject as part of the top 100.

But if you thought that, you would be wrong. It’s not a question of one blog being picked over another since this is, after all, just another vanity contest that small niche blogs don’t have a shot of winning. No, the significant thing is that the vaunted American Bar Association simply doesn’t think that this field of law is relevant. The decision to ignore a vast segment of the law speaks volumes about the organization.

[Addendum: The “ABA Mission” is at odds with their exclusionary choices:

The Mission of the American Bar Association is to be the national representative of the legal profession, serving the public and the profession by promoting justice, professional excellence and respect for the law.]

OK, short rant over. Cue Rodney…

Links to this post:

Why Big Firms Don’t Blog Well: Not Too Much Risk, But Too Little
Chalk one up for the solos and small firms. For what it’s worth, we dominate the ranks of the Third Annual ABA Blawg 100. By contrast, only two large firm blogs made the cut, Mark Herrmann observes at Drug and Device Law,

posted by loce@his.com (Carolyn Elefant) @ December 03, 2009 10:11 PM

law bloggers respond to aba blawg 100 post
our post last month commenting on the aba journal’s blawg 100 has generated some serious discussion around the blogosphere. legal bloggers from across the spectrum have offered their two cents on the issue, each offering a very

posted by rob@lexblog.com (Rob La Gatta) @ December 17, 2007 1:30 PM

aba journal “blawg 100″ controversy
the selection of sites, as well as the whole traffic-building beauty-contest genre that it may be seen as typifying, has stirred up a considerable volume of discussion: see giacalone, elefant, the unaccountably omitted turkewitz,

posted by Walter Olson @ December 04, 2007 12:38 PM

“best of” lists: the unbearable truth bared
in the wake of the controversy (see, eg., kevin o’keefe, eric turkewitz, and carolyn elefant) created by the recently-announced “the aba journal blawg 100” list of the “best web sites by lawyers, for lawyers” (featured in our prior

posted by David Giacalone @ November 30, 2007 2:03 PM

We Agree With A Plaintiff’s Lawyer!
We’re not quite as outraged as you are, Eric Turkewitz, but we agree with you. And, if we agree with a plaintiff’s lawyer, that’s news that’s fit to print. (The issue has to do with a list of top legal blogs. Click through here only if

posted by Beck/Herrmann @ November 29, 2007 10:21 AM

UN-AMERICAN
I just found out that this blog was left out of the ABA Journal’s Blaw 100. It has become clear to me that the ABA has been taken over by communists, hell bent on destroying our American way of life. As you all know, it never starts as
posted by . @ November 28, 2007 10:06 PM

Tags:

9 Responses Leave a comment

  • Justinian Lane 2007.11.29 at 12:30 | Quote

    Come on, Eric. You should know by now that the only REAL law is BIG law. Lawyers who represent individuals aren’t real lawyers; only lawyers with Fortune 500 clients are.

  • David M. Gottlieb, Esq. 2007.11.29 at 13:51 | Quote

    They left me out too. I posted about it. Commie bastards!

  • Eric Turkewitz 2007.11.29 at 14:58 | Quote

    David Gottlieb’s post can be found here:

    Un-American

    Unfortunately, Blogger wouldn’t allow me to make this link red, which seems to indicate a conspiracy.

  • Kevin OKeefe 2007.11.29 at 17:17 | Quote

    Didn’t Belli create ATLA because of the politically correct, defense oriented ABA? Now he also liked th dancing girls and alchoal that made his conventions a little wilder as well. ;)

  • Carolyn Elefan 2007.11.29 at 22:06 | Quote

    Eric, You are absolutely right. The largest gap in the ABA competition are practicing attorney blogs (with the exception of criminal lawyers), particularly the dozens of excellent niche practicing lawyer blogs. It’s not just the PI blogs that were left out, but also the family law blogs, trust and estate blogs and others which strike the almost impossible balance between making the law accessible and understandable to lay people on the one hand, yet offering enough sophistication and analysis to capture the attention of lawyers. And, on top of all that, these lawyers are running full time law practices on their own (as opposed to working for large firms where there’s a little more support). MyShingle was included in the mix, but to be honest, I’m equally proud of my “sleeper practice blog” on offshore renewable energy where I get to analyze emerging cases (I’m also partial to Blogwatch which is much more challenging to write than MyShingle and still finding its way).

  • Larry Rogak 2007.11.30 at 15:20 | Quote

    Let’s face it: to those stiffs and Poindexters in the empty suits at the fancy law firms, any lawyer in a field where the billing rate is less than $250 an hour is just a schlepper, a hondler,a busboy, riffraff (even though every once in a while, one of those empty suits is revealed to be someone who never in fact was admitted to the Bar, or who spends his leisure time hiring underage girls to satiate his lusts in his pied-a-terre). To a lawyer whose practice consists of helping one giant client to either defeat or devour another giant, in matters which generate millions of dollars in fees, a personal injury lawyer for the most part is in the same class as the guys who suddenly appear on Manhattan street corners hawking umbrellas as soon as the first drops of rain fall. Just like in the movie Trading Places, the “important” lawyers are like Dan Ackroyd’s Louis Winthorpe III, successful and hubristic commodities broker, and the personal injury lawyers are Eddie Murphy’s Billy-Ray Valentine, a down and out street hustler who solicits alms by hiding his feet under a dolly and posing as a legless veteran. It’s elitism, it’s stupid, it’s unfair, but that’s the way it is. And this little sample of my writing style should make it evident why my own blog flies under the ABA’s radar. Larry Rogak (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheRogakReport)

  • Eric Turkewitz 2007.11.30 at 22:28 | Quote

    Larry:

    I found your home page, but not a blog. And a guy who writes like you do ought to have a blog.

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.