Blawggies and Blawg Review

Two law blog items:

First, if you didn’t get enough Christmas yesterday, you can go back for more with the Christmas Eve themed Blawg Review #140 presented by Jonathan Frieden at E-Commerce Law. Frieden mixes commerce and Christmas with law blogs in his 12 Days of Christmas (plus stocking-stuffers).

Next up, Dennis Kennedy gives out his 2007 “Blawggies” for the best law oriented law blogs, and gives one to “niche blogs” as the most important trend. What is a niche blog? According to Kennedy, they “have titles like [State Name] [Practice Area] Law Blog.”

While it’s an interesting concept, it seems that the vast majority of law blogs actually fall into the category of “niche” once you get past the name, including his own on law technology and the one for best blawg about blawging (to Kevin O’Keefe, of course), among others he has chosen. As a percentage of the legal blogosphere there are really very few law blogs that focus outside of a niche.

While it’s true that some blogs have descriptive names, such as this one, this is often done to give new readers a quick overview of where they landed. But it isn’t the name that creates the niche but the content. If I used my name for a title instead of my practice area, would I no longer be a niche?

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Blawg Review Ascends to Paradise
  2. Blawg Review – Coming Attractions (I’m next week’s host)
  3. Blawg Review of the Year Nominations
  4. Reviewing the Marathon Blawg Review
  5. Blawg Review of the Year Nominations To Close Soon

Tags:

December 26, 2007 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.