My Car Accident – A Short Postscript


I had an accident on a local parkway on December 7th that I wrote about, after a car stopped suddenly in the left lane, I stopped, and was then rear-ended.

So here is the end of the story: There were no injuries of any kind to anyone that I know of. The little twinge I felt the night of the accident was just that, a little twinge of zero significance.

As to the property damage, my loss was covered 100% by the car that plowed into me. This isn’t always the case, as new blogger Jim Reed discusses today.

Since I occasionally take my shots at various insurance companies on this blog for various acts of malfeasance, then fairness dictates I should also acknowledge a company when it does the right thing. The car that hit me was insured by Liberty Mutual.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. A Lawyer’s Car Accident (My Own)
  2. Al Pirro Settles NY Car Accident Suit Involving Jeanine For 200K
  3. Car Accident Lawsuit, Based on Dumpster in Street, Dismissed by Appellate Court
  4. Metro Train Accident and Client Solicitation
  5. How, Exactly, Did That Elevator Accident Occur?

Tags:

One Response Leave a comment

  • Jim Reed 2007.12.27 at 12:16 | Quote

    Eric– So glad that all worked out well for you with your accident. Even though we both earn our livings as accident lawyers, I am sure you share my wish that there were fewer accidents, fewer injuries and fewer problems with insurance companies…

    As to Liberty Mutual, my past experience with that insurance company has been positive and I agree with you that we should praise the companies that generally do the right thing while continuing our relentless battle to take to to task those insurance carriers who do not…

    Happy New Year to you and your readers!

    Jim Reed, http://www.nyinjurylawblog.com

    Replyhttp://www.nyinjurylawblog.com‘); return false;”>Quote

Leave a Reply


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.