New York Judge Grows Protest Beard Over Salary Issue

Nine years is a long time to go without a raise. And that’s how long New York’s judges have gone without. And when I say no raise, I mean they haven’t even received a cost of living increase to their $135,900 salary.

So Staten Island’s Acting Supreme Court Justice Philip Straniere is letting his whiskers go as his way of protesting.

The story comes out of the Staten Island Advance (hat tip: How Appealing), and here is they money quote on his four-month old beard:

[T]the way things are going, my beard should be long enough by Christmas for me to get work as a sidewalk Santa for some charity.”

Since first year associates at big firms blow the judiciary out of the water with the money they make, we can expect a decline in our state’s judiciary if this continues.

And if the beard idea gets traction in the courthouses, things could get interesting.

Previously covered:

Links to this post:

judge grows beard in protest of judicial salaries
eric turkewitz’s new york personal injury law blog has a post on staten island’s acting supreme court justice philip straniere growing a pretty much out of control beard in protest of new york judges failure to get a raise in nine years
posted by Ronald V. Miller, Jr. @ December 08, 2007 11:53 AM
  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. New York Judges Slowing Cases From Legislators’ Law Firms Over Pay Raise Issue (Updated)
  2. A Judicial Brawl in New York As Chief Judge Kaye Abandons Lawsuit Threat
  3. New York Judge Removed For Anti-Semitic Slur
  4. New York Chief Judge Flip-Flops On Lawsuit. Again
  5. New York Chief Judge Kaye To Be Reconfirmed Today

Tags:

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.