New York Personal Injury Law Blog: New York's Million Dollar Dog Bite

Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY  

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

 

New York's Million Dollar Dog Bite

Headlines like this always catch my eye: PUTTIN' $1M BITE ON DOG 'OWNER'. It comes out of the New York Post and catches my eye for the obvious reason that NY personal injury law is my thing, and therefore the headline screams out something to me that the casual reader doesn't see: The attorney who brought the million dollar lawsuit doesn't really know personal injury law.

How do I know this? Because in New York you aren't allowed anymore to make that monetary demand for damages when you file a lawsuit. (See: New York Cleans Up Claims Act.) We dumped that idiotic rule in the mid-80s for malpractice suits and dumped it in 2003 for the rest of the personal injury suits.

A read of the article shows absolutely nothing remarkable about the suit except for two things: The amount claimed and access to a publicist to pitch the story based on the very tangential pseudo-celebrity "news" that the defendant is a former wife of Morton Downey, Jr., a deceased talk talk show host who used a trash talk format.

I'm tempted to write about the story barking at me, it's a real woofer, etc. but I find little humor when I see such headlines that ultimately disparage the profession, since the article doesn't specify any damages worthy of such a demand. Moreover, such articles alter the perceptions of potential litigants to unreasonably think that every claim will result in a million dollar result. The law just doesn't work that way.

Labels:


Comments: Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

 


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?