New York Slip (or Trip) And Fall Lawsuits – A Couple of Notes

A couple of links today to point you elsewhere, because I see no need to re-invent the wheel on some basics for the practitioner.

First is an intake questionnaire for a slip and fall case [10/5/09: That page, from a company called Beacon Network Investigations, with a list of various questions, has now been altered] to get the basic information you need. When I see one of these, I always cross-check it against my own to see if I can improve the one I use.

Note that it is not comprehensive. It’s missing, for example. the date/time/place. And every intake sheet in a personal injury case should ask if the client has filed for bankruptcy or intends to. (Because if they do, any potential suit belongs to the bankruptcy trustee, not the injured person.). Nevertheless, it’s always good to see if one’s own intake forms can be improved or refreshed by looking at others.

Next up is an article on snow and ice cases written by Scott Kreppein for a local lawyer’s quarterly that he has reprinted. Cases regarding injuries from falls on snow and ice get tossed out by the courts all the time (see, for example, Sip and Fall on Ice/Slush – Case Dismissed) because a storm is still in progress or for other reasons. It’s important to know this stuff before the client interview, so that the attorney can do a proper analyses and not find him or herself with an unhappy client and unhappy bank account a year or two later. A good post to copy and save, and one that includes additional practitioner tips.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.