New York Personal Injury Law Blog: State Farm Hit With New RICO Suit, Brought as Class Action by Patient for Sham Exams

Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY  

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

 

State Farm Hit With New RICO Suit, Brought as Class Action by Patient for Sham Exams

State Farm was hit last week by yet another racketeering lawsuit. The new suit is brought by a patient charging that State Farm was conspiring with so called "independent" medical exam companies to conduct sham exams designed to deprive injured people of benefits under New York's No Fault law.

Unlike the suit brought two months ago (see State Farm Hit With Civil RICO Claim Over Sham Medical Exams), which was brought by a physician charging that his practice suffered as a result of collusion between State Farm, medical exam companies and physicians, this one was brought by a patient and brought as a class action.

The suits arise as a result of New York's No-Fault law, that mandates each motor have insurance that provides up to $50,000 in basic economic loss regardless of fault. This loss includes both medical expenses as well as lost wages, among other things. (In exchange, the injured person surrenders the right to bring suit unless a serious injury has occurred.) As a condition to the treatment that the injured may obtain from their own medical providers, the insurance companies are entitled to force exams by their own "independent" physicians to see if the treatment is necessary. These so-called independent exams may thus be the means by which insurers stop paying for treatment, and has been the basis of these lawsuits.

The suit is brought by Bruce Rosenberg of Bellmore New York, who had also brought the prior State Farm suit as well as another by a practitioner against Allstate (see: Allstate Slammed With RICO Charge Over Sham Medical Exams).

The subject has been smoking hot around here, as one of the defendant doctors responded on this blog with a guest post (see: A Doctor, Sued In Insurance Company RICO Suit, Responds To The Charge). In the comments, other defendants have also stepped forward, and thus far 39 comments have been recorded as the subject sizzles on, away from this blog's main page.

I don't know attorney Rosenberg, but he clearly seems to be taking on an entire industry with these three suits (and one wonders if more are to come from other patients). And if he has the goods, evidence-wise, we may see some remarkable legal action in the year or two ahead.

Hat tip to David Gottlieb who first uncovered the suit and blogged it at No Fault Paradise.

The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. A copy of the suit is here: RICO-Sundahl-v.StateFarm.pdf

Labels:


Comments:
ABC, 123 no such thing as an "independent medical exam" in no fault law maybe you have been suckered by the workers compensation law. The no fault law and the insurance contracts provide for INSURER medical exams by physicians. If you check the definition of physician according to NY law you will find that means M.D. or D.O. while your at it you might want to check out the penal law concerning forgery and fraud. construction 101 no ambiguity no need for construction. if you forget history it is bound to repeat itself. Maybe some of the defendants should either watch the movie 300 or read about the spartans. best regards Leonidis
 
fyi the court denied State Farms application for a stay of discovery. Maybe the the insurance industry is not the Jedi after all.
 
I do have a Attorney at this time,But I have just read your Article,and was amazed that this is what My Fiance,and Myself are going through with Statefarm Insurance.We were in a Auto Accident, {not our fault} and they are pulling everything to get rid of us.My Fiance is now going for his 3rd IME.I cant see how they can get away with this,When my Policy shows what I should be covered for.

They have booted me off,and Im hoping My Attorney is persuing Arbitration.I am in so much pain,lost my job,and had no choice to go to Welfare.{Thank god I had insurance huh?}



Very Good Article, I hope something changes
 
Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

 


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?