Linkworthy

Brooks Schuelke has Personal Injury Law Round-Up #68 (in case you’re wondering, I did the first 36, which is to say, Brooks will blow past me next month if he doesn’t burn out);

Blawg Review #166 is up at GeekLawyer, and if you’re offended by the content, you’re probably in good company, since he appears to be an equal opportunity offender. Let’s just say this is one time I was pleased to be ignored. According to Colin Samuels, “Those of you who are just discovering him now will . . . not be bored. Scandalized perhaps, but not bored.” Ed. at Blawg Review does a supplement.

Jason Boog at Judicial Reports on the deep psychological stress some judges undergo;

It appears that the Mississippi Supreme Court is bending over backwards to favor corporations. Kia Franklin at TortDeform has the story. Interestingly, the only response so far is commenters that attack the messenger instead of the data.

And Scott Greenfield on why so many law profs rarely link to the blogs of practicing lawyers.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Linkworthy
  2. Linkworthy
  3. Linkworthy
  4. Linkworthy
  5. Linkworthy

Tags:

July 1, 2008 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.