Linkworthy

Since my picture has never before graced the pages of Wired Magazine (and likely never will again), I’ll start with this link to their article on the NASA program. Gracing the top of their electronic page is my family watching Apollo 15 blast off to the moon on July 26, 1971. Two of my three brothers are on the roof of the old Vista Cruiser that we drove down from New York. I’m on the far left. (Photo credit: Dad).

Anne Reed (of Deliberations fame) finds her way to the pages of Trial Magazine for a story on what to expect (and not expect) of mock juries;

The Tennessee Supreme Court upholds a $13M punitive damage award against Chrysler;

Massachusetts adopts the “loss of chance” doctrine (via Walter Olson @ Overlawyered);

Google finds one trillion unique URLs (Macworld);

And most importantly, Scott Greenfield at Simple Justice meets the expectations of the masses with a great job hosting Blawg Review #170, honoring the 14th Amendment by looking at equal protection issues wherever he finds them. Which is to say, everywhere.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. Linkworthy
  2. Linkworthy
  3. Linkworthy
  4. Linkworthy
  5. Linkworthy

Tags:

July 28, 2008 · No Comments ·

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.