Linkworthy


Sometimes life gets in the way of blogging. And that’s a good thing. Two weekends ago I ran in the 210 mile Reach the Beach Relay in New Hampshire. This past weekend I threw a suprise party for my wife (that was a huge surprise, when she found out three days in advance). And next weekend I am organizing the inaugural running of the Paine to Pain 1/2 Marathon trail race here in Westchester.

In playing blog catch-up, these are some of the things that caught my eye with interest:

Scott Greenfield doesn’t mind the huge federal bail out of Wall Street, but he wants something in return;

An intentional running down of pedestrians is an accident for insurance purposes, rules a New York appellate court (No-Fault Paradise);

Kevin Underhill summarizes the legislation giving the Treasury $700B to spend as they choose with no oversight;

David Newdorf says litigation is like running a marathon, at law.com. My question: How did this guy get inside my head and how do I get rid of him?

TortsProf has the 9/19/08 edition of the Personal Injury Law Round-Up;

Blawg Review #178 comes up from down under, which follows, naturally, Blawg Review #177 (in case you weren’t around, like me, and want to see what folks were talking about last week).

Share

Related posts:

  1. Linkworthy
  2. Linkworthy (Rounding Up the Round-Ups Edition)
  3. Linkworthy
  4. Linkworthy
  5. Linkworthy

Tags:

September 23, 2008 · Comments Off ·

Comments are closed.

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.