Friday, June 12, 2009

Linkworthy

The Citizen Media Law Project does a step-by-step analysis of how Tony La Russa's lawsuit against Twitter went viral;

Did a local news reporter cross the line of propriety here in a Sexaholics Anonymous report?

In an breathless "expose" ... an obviously inexperienced "investigative" reporter for a local cable news organization climaxed her over-the-top report by melodramatically bursting into a closed meeting of Sexaholics Anonymous "demanding answers" to her "disturbing questions" and expressing "frustration" that the startled sex addicts would not interrupt their meeting to sit down with her for impromptu on-camera interviews.

White Coat Notes continues his series of what it's like to be a medical malpractice defendant. In part 4, he talks about deposition prep and in part 5, the deposition itself.

Ron Miller has big concerns over Obama caving to medical lobby by enacting a "reform" in order to pass health insurance legislation.

The New York Times has an article today about A.I.G. balking at paying claims regarding the US Airways flight 1459 that ditched in the Hudson in January. In addition to lost property, some folks are now suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. No surprise here, as I indicated on the day of the crash that was likely to happen.

And Blawg Review #215 sets sail at Carolyn Elefant's My Shingle, with a distinctly nautical theme.

Labels: Random Notes

posted by Eric Turkewitz
Permanent Link

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.