Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Welcome Washington Time Readers (And Sonia Sotomayor Fans)

I am quoted in an editorial of The Washington Times for Wednesday, June 24 (Sotomayor's Ethical Oversight). The editorial deals with Sotomayor's former firm Sotomayor & Associates, when there don't appear to have been any associates. My original post can be referenced here: Did Sotomayor Violate NY Ethics Rules in Private Solo Practice with "& Associates" Name?

The first half of the editorial comes pretty much straight from my posting. From there the Times goes off on a tangent trying to find greater significance.

I will leave it to others to comment on whether the Washington Times took a long stretch in the significance of the violation. (For the last two weeks I've been too busy with work to put together much new content on this blog.)

In the meantime, if you are a new reader, here is a "greatest hits" for this blog, so that you can consider subscribing or adding this site to your RSS feed. But remember, do it today because the price will double next week.

Labels: Media Appearances

posted by Eric Turkewitz
Permanent Link

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.