Friday, January 8, 2010

Linkworthy

Medical researchers go hunting for a link between disease and lawyers, and Max Kennerly takes the "research" and rips it limb from limb;

The PopTort has become, over the last several months, a truly outstanding blog. They wrote recently how Katrina hospital victims were, literally, dead in the water, and how tort "reform" in Texas failed to bring docs back to rural areas;

Kevin, M.D. has a round-up of his most popular posts from 2009, many of which have a legal angle to them;

Avvo makes 8 predictions for the legal field for 2010;

The NY Court of Appeals hears oral argument on the issue of "sole proximate cause" of the worker as a defense to strict liability under our Labor Law;

Since when did cyber-stalking become a gender issue? Eugene Volokh starts the conversation and Scott Greenfield (who is being stalked along with other guys, I might add) says to hell with that. (Previously here, Twitter Followers and Stalkers -- Can You Tell the Difference?);

Am I my blogger's keeper? Carolyn Elefant and Brian Tannebaum on ethical issues and lawyers' professional obligations regarding marketing;

And Blawg Review #245 comes at us from Charon QC with this exquisite theme:

I have no theme -- other than to look at as many good blog posts and bloggers as I can under various quasi-random headings.

Labels: Random Notes

posted by Eric Turkewitz
Permanent Link

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.