New York Personal Injury Law Blog: Trial Lawyer Lobbying On Health Care Bill

Eric Turkewitz, The Turkewitz Law Firm, New York, NY  

Monday, January 25, 2010

 

Trial Lawyer Lobbying On Health Care Bill

Over at Point of Law, Carter Wood points out that the American Association of Justice spent 1.33M in the 3rd quarter for congressional lobbying, much some of it on the health care bill. In his commentary, Wood says:
The filing provides more evidence that the trial lawyers helped craft language establishing state demonstration projects, preventing serious reform.
Now this is what the health care insurance industry spent: $38 million in 2009. (via WSJ Health Blog). [Update: This is limited to the health insurers, and does not, for instance, include drug makers. Also, note that the lobbying by the attorneys' group includes a wide array of consumer issues.]

One of the constants of the tort "reform" lobby is pointing out what consumer groups spend to preserve rights, and ignoring the vast sums that come out of the Fortune 500 to lobby for various corporate immunities.

Labels:


Comments:
Eric,

You fail to appreciate that, if the health care / insurance industry was granted further immunities from suit, then they would start raining money down on consumers. In fact, they're spending all that lobbying money so that they can spend even more money "giving back" their insurance premiums to all the patients.

Despite that generosity, you have the nerve to stand in the way because you believe people injured by other's negligence are entitled to compensation.

You should be ashamed of yourself.
 
Yes, yes, I have clearly missed the benevolence of the insurance industry.

On a related note, one day, perhaps, I will write about how liability carriers are all just begging to use the premiums they have collected to settle cases justly and fairly.
 
Post a Comment



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

 


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.

 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?