Snow Days and the Statute of Limitations


Courts in New York City are closed today for the snow storm, as they are in various places up and down the eastern seaboard. So what happens if the statute of limitations expires today, and the courts are closed?

I popped that question to David Gottlieb, who runs No-Fault Paradise (and theCPLRblog). In the comments of this post: Snow Day? he tackled the issue.

And the good news for New York practitioners (and their clients): We are safe. He found Martin v. J.C. Penney Co., Inc. 275 A.D.2d 910 (App. Div., 4th, 2000), which arose when the courts in Buffalo were closed for a storm on the same day the SOL was to run. We get the extra day because Judiciary Law 282-a provides that,

“[w]henever the last day on which any paper is required to be filed with a clerk of a court * * * expires on a Saturday, Sunday, a public holiday or a day when the office of such clerk is closed for the transaction of business, the time therefor is hereby extended to and including the next business day such office is open for the transaction of business.”

Check out comment #2 of his post for the decision. So unless someone can challenge the power of the court to close itself down, you’re good.

Of course, it would be slightly better practice NOT TO WAIT UNTIL THE LAST DAY TO FILE YOUR PAPERS.

That is all.

Coney Island stock photo credit: Dan Turkewitz

  • Share/Bookmark

Related posts:

  1. FAQ: Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Cases
  2. The Days After September 11th — A Tribute To An Attorney
  3. Blawg Review of the Year Nominations – 4 Days Left
  4. SuperLawyers Gets Sold, Creates Conflict With FindLaw (And My Days As A SuperLawyer Seem Numbered)
  5. New York Slip (or Trip) And Fall Lawsuits – A Couple of Notes

Tags:

No Responses Leave a comment

Leave a Reply


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.