Yodle and Attorney Advertising

Want to see something funny about attorney advertising?

Try Googling this phrase:

Our commitment to you is to go the extra mile to win your case, and we take that pledge very seriously.

The result, pages and pages of lawyer websites using the exact same quote, can be seen here.

A big old hat tip to Mark Bennett of Houston who was taking a look at the advertising skills of a company called Yodle that sells websites to lawyers.

Are you using Yodle? And do you think you are getting what you paid for by having the same content as so many others?

Yodle’s slogan is “Get Found.” OK, I found you. Do you think I’m impressed?

——————–

See also:  Yodle Lawyer Marketing Sucks (Bennett @ Defending People)

Related:

Tags:

6 Responses Leave a comment

  • Lihsa 2010.11.5 at 14:33 | Quote

    That is reprehensible.

  • Eric Turkewitz 2010.11.5 at 14:46 | Quote

    That is reprehensible.

    I think you’re being too kind.

    I wonder what the contracts say about the quality and uniqueness of the websites that Yodle was supposed to deliver?

  • Jordy 2010.11.8 at 11:57 | Quote

    They are also using lawyers to rank higher for the term “law marketing” – notice the link in the footer that goes to their website.

  • Brandon West 2010.11.8 at 15:12 | Quote

    Unfortunately, this is *very* common within the law marketing arena. Common language, common site design, ridiculous price tags for garbage work that wouldn’t fly in any other market segment. I’m not going to give other offenders the publicity here, but has anyone noticed how similar most law websites are? As a consumer, how can I tell if you’re *different* from the stereotype or not?

  • Joshua 2011.7.25 at 21:57 | Quote

    As a former Yodle victim, who was running his own google analytics, CMS, and adwords campaign prior to switching to them, I can tell you that their approach is pretty much disastrous for anyone looking to achieve a legit online presence. So how did I make such a huge mistake? Simple, when trials come up, I can’t manage the campaigns and marketing, ergo outsource to Yodle.

    They will waste thousands of dollars a week trying key word combs and doing anything and everything to get you clicks. One problem… they aren’t the kinds of clicks you want or can even use. Ex: Say your a divorce lawyer, well yodle doesn’t care… they’re gonna set up keyword search for whatever is popular. Congratulations divorce lawyer, you know have 11 bankruptcy lawyer clicks… AWESOME! Here is the other kicker: redundancy! In addition to repeated content, they repeat submissions, which lower your quality index.

    So now that yodle has wrecked thousands and thousands of companies and firms, they are buying smaller competitors like “GETRANKED.com” who have a semi-legitimate approach. They’ll get you listed on the first page of a major search engine like ask jeeves or lycos…. AWESOME. The frustrating part is that I’m sure all of us made the same decision: I can either focus on my practice, or focus on suing Yodle, thereby continuing to slow me down.

  • andrews 2012.2.13 at 14:21 | Quote

    There’s no obvious way to stop them. I heard from their cold-call sales critter today, and he says he is going through the [state] bar listings and seeing who needs cases.

    He did not agree with my assessmeht that cold calling should be a felony.

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.