Linkworthy

Some things I’d love to write more about if only I had more time…

Walter Olson speaks out against federal medical malpractice “reform”; (I had previously written about a federal power grab of state tort issues while Bush II was in office.)

Medical immunity in Florida that they call tort “reform;”

Did you know…malpractice costs play a surprisingly small role in our healthcare costs?

Want to see a good reason people hate health insurance companies? United Healthcare Decides You Only Needed Second Of Two Procedures

Proof that Twitter doesn’t work as business development for blogging;

A killer Blawg Revew #310 by Siouxsie Law, the world’s leading Goth based law blog;

And when Don McLean sang that he took his Chevy to the levee but the levee was dry, was he referring to a bar in New Rochelle?

Share

Related posts:

  1. Linkworthy (If Only I Had More Time…)
  2. Linkworthy (Updated!)
  3. Linkworthy
  4. Linkworthy
  5. Linkworthy

Tags:

May 26, 2011 · 3 Comments ·

3 Responses Leave a comment

  • Bryan 2011.5.31 at 08:58 | Quote

    I really don’t agree with the one about twitter not working. Considering you have a twitter I assume you disagree as well?

    Reply – Quote
  • Eric Turkewitz 2011.5.31 at 09:37 | Quote

    @Bryan –

    I really don’t agree with the one about twitter not working. Considering you have a twitter I assume you disagree as well?

    I really only use it as a means of distributing blog posts. I don’t consider that business development.

    Reply – Quote

Comments are closed.

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.