Van Halen, Brown M&Ms and Personal Injury

Well, you gotta be impressed. This is a linkage I never could have imagined.

The old story goes that, when Van Halen was touring big arenas in the ’80s, they banned brown M&Ms from their dressing rooms. The ban was part of a rider on the contract that gives the local arenas all the little quirks of the performers.

Those types of quirks of the rich and famous have always made for good reading. Jennifer Lopez, for instance, demanded as part of a charity video shoot, that her dressing room be white, with white flowers, white candles, white couches and white drapes. A contract by Mary J. Blige demanded new toilet seats.

And brown M&Ms was part of the Van Halen contract.

Why? It was for safety. As frontman Dave Lee Roth explains, getting ready for an upcoming tour and new album with the group, if there were brown M&Ms around backstage, it simply meant that the local arena had not read the contract. And because this band travelled much heavier than others — meaning more 18 wheelers hauling all kinds of gear from place to place — there was more room for injury and technical error.

So they slipped in the brown M&Ms as a safety check. Gotta love that.

Tags:

2 Responses Leave a comment

  • Mellie 2012.2.16 at 15:21 | Quote

    Van Halen II is the newest release from Van Halen, and I can only think that of one particular phrase to identify this Cd… Amazing!

  • Jeff 2012.2.28 at 15:06 | Quote

    I have heard some many different reasons why. This is the only reason that has every made any sense thanks for sharing.

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.