Rakofsky Motion #12 – Allbritton and TBD.com move to dismiss

There is now another motion to dismiss in the Joseph Rakofsky defamation lawsuit. This one was filed Tuesday by defendants Allbritton and TBD.com. Allbritton owns seven broadcast television stations as well as TBD.com. TBD aggregates news stories. This was the post they were sued on, which linked to the original Washington Post article on the subject.

Defense counsel is Jake Goldstein from Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.

The motion does not address the content of the material posted, but simply attacks the failure to properly serve the papers properly, that TBD.com is not an entity that can be sued, and the fact that Allbritton is not subject to jurisdiction in New York. (The company is based in Arlington, VA.) While the company owns broadcast television stations, none of them are in New York.

If you want to read their papers, this is the relevant document:Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Update 6/25/12: Reply Memo of Law: Reply Memo


6 Responses Leave a comment

  • Elliot 2012.3.16 at 19:07 | Quote

    Has a schedule been set for briefing and argument of the motions?
    I can’t wait to read Rakofsky’s whining responses.

  • Eric Turkewitz 2012.3.16 at 21:34 | Quote

    There is a conference coming up this week. With so many lawyers involved and so many motions I won’t predict what will happen.

    And if I could predict, I wouldn’t do it publicly anyway.

  • Elliot 2012.3.16 at 23:26 | Quote

    Not asking you for any nonpublic information. Just keep your fans posted on tjhe schedule when the court sets one.

  • Eric Turkewitz 2012.3.17 at 08:44 | Quote

    Small details may get put up on my Twitter feed (@Turkewitz). I’ll use the blog for significant documents.

  • Anthony DeGuerre 2012.3.20 at 13:04 | Quote

    So what did Mr. Randazza do to Mr. Rakofsky this last week? The fanfare for Mr. Randazza hints that something is afoot! I look forward to further updates…

  • Leah Weaver 2012.3.29 at 11:28 | Quote

    Eric, thanks for keeping these updates going. I’m one of the named defendants (yay me!) but since I was never properly served and NY can’t obtain jurisdiction over me anyway, I haven’t bothered to respond in the least. But I’m glad to be able to keep up on the case as it heads to the inevitable dismissal.

Comments are closed.

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.