Apple, Siri, Distracted Driving and the Future of the Automobile

A CNET mock-up of an Apple device integrated into a car (though I expect Apple will do a hell of a lot nicer job than this)

Two movements are rapidly coming together and will go head-to-head in the coming years:

First is the push to ban driving while on a cell phone — even if it’s a hands-free device. This is due to so many accidents occurring from distracted driving. There are 10 states that already ban it. The problem is not with drivers taking their eyes off the road, but a failure to concentrate. The National Highway Transportation Board wants to ban it in all 50 states.  A sample story is here, that includes some data:

According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, more than 3,000 persons died in 2010 because of distraction-related accidents, National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman said last December in calling for a 50-state total ban on the use of cell phones and other portable electronic devices. “It’s time to stand up for safety by turning off electronic devices when driving.”

Now contrast this to the rapid movement of technology, with Apple at the forefront. Just days ago they announced that they were ditching Google maps in favor of their own, and that these would be incorporated into future cars, including BMW, General Motors, Toyota, Mercedes-Benz, Honda, and Audi.

What does that mean? It means that drivers will be able to use Apple’s Siri voice system to input destinations, and Siri will respond without the need to punch in data. From CNET on the announcement:

The new button should be a welcome change for drivers who are used to manually entering their destinations into a GPS, or laboring through complicated voice-activated menu trees to perform simple tasks, like changing the radio station or placing a phone call. By leveraging Siri’s natural language voice control platform, theoretically drivers will be able to keep their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road to minimize distracted driving.

With Apple integrated into the car, it seems likely that such devices would also include the music that people have on their iPods/iPhones, as well as the ability to use those phones. One need not be a genius to foresee Apple integrating maps, music and phones into one device in the car, and allowing a simple wireless sync either with the handheld device that remains in your pocket or with its cloud based service.  Texting and emailing could be voice-activated.

This means a dramatic rise in driver activity, for what would likely be an extremely popular device. So the future, it seems, is likely to see significant increases in drivers interacting with electronics, albeit it in a safer way than in the past. No one, for instance, will need to take their eyes off the road to punch buttons on radios.

Looking into my crystal ball I see more accidents, of the rear-end I-wasn’t-paying-attention type. As opposed to those that took their eyes off the road and swerved into another lane as they spun the radio dial.

How legislatures (and the National Transportation Safety Board) deal with this remains to be seen, but I would expect vigorous debate to continue that focuses on the issues of the role of government and consumer safety.

Tags:

6 Responses Leave a comment

  • TouroGrad 2012.6.15 at 11:17 | Quote

    I have experienced first hand the results of distracted drivers. As a new attorney with cases all over Long Island, New York City and Westchester County, I drive about 36,000 miles a year, and people have driven into the back of my stopped car three times since November.

    The worst one, I was stopped for a full minute and watched an Expedition drive into my car at speed after watching it do the “looking at your phone wiggle”. I was hit so hard that that every occupied seat in my car broke.

    The other two were caused by people not paying attention, as well. I see crashes (or the aftermath of crashes) caused by distracted drivers on a regular basis, where the driver of a car scrapes 3 or 4 cars parked on the side of the road, until a car that’s wider than the others brings it to a stop.

    It appears to me that the types of crashes that are occurring are changing because of all of the amazing gadgetry that we have access to now. Is that the case? Are the types of injury producing crashes changing?

  • Old Geezer 2012.6.15 at 14:34 | Quote

    All quite true, but lurking not too far behind the distractions are the technologies to avoid collisions. We’ve already seen demo versions of autos that drive themselves without human intervention. The next step will be a device that automatically dials an attorney in the event of an accident and sends him/her a video of the last 5 minutes of driving prior to the event. Fifty years after that will be autos that, in the case of an accident, each call their respective insurer with details and negotiate a settlement among themselves right then. Replacement vehicles will be delivered to the site within hours, while a dozen Wall-E bots appear and sweep up the broken pseudo-glass. It’s all very thrilling to contemplate.

    But for now, it is to take one’s life in one’s hands just find the wipers, on the fly, while in an unfamiliar rental car at night. Never mind mere texting.

  • I agree with you, even if pushing buttons goes away the distraction still exists. The more technology we bring into our cars with us the more dangerous it’s going to become to drive.

  • car lifts 2012.6.26 at 07:58 | Quote

    There are 10 states that already ban it. The problem is not with drivers taking their eyes off the road, but a failure to concentrate.

  • Ron Miller 2012.6.26 at 17:24 | Quote

    I have no idea if technology will save lives or take more. There are so many crosswinds.

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.