New York Suspends Statutes of Limitations in Wake of Hurricane Sandy (Updated)

Gov. Andrew Cuomo visiting the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel

I was wondering when this would happen, but it finally has. Gov. Andrew Cuomo has issued an Executive Order suspending the statute of limitations in a wide variety of cases, both civil and criminal. The term of the suspension is indefinite. This affects the time to bring a suit, the time to file an appeal, and the time to bring criminal prosecutions. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has acted also, extending the time to file a notice of appeal to some litigants.

The reasons should be obvious, but if you don’t live in New York, you might not appreciate what is going on. The courts in the city have fluctuated between closed and dysfunctional. Lawyers, staff and court personnel can’t reach offices as subway tunnels between the boroughs are still underwater, and buses and bridges are packed to the rafters. Many remain without power, or have become homeless as a result of the devastation.

A similar order was issued by Gov. George Pataki after the September 11 attack, for a period of 58 days.

New York, and our cousins in New Jersey, will get through the mess, though the damage to some families will be sadly permanent.

In the interim, the Governor has done the right thing to insure that artificially created time periods don’t unnecessarily injury the legal rights of others.

Pending cases are expected to be in disarray for awhile as the city gets back on its feet and gets its systems up and running, so that trials can be rescheduled.

Update 11/2/12 – The New York Law Journal has a story out today on the court disruptions, and lawyer groups mobilizing to assist victims. It also notes, among other things, that the Office of Court Administration, which is downtown, is closed due to flooding.

And there is this quote from New York Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman that I thought was worth repeating, given the comparison to September 11:

“You don’t have the tremendous loss of life that you had on 9/11, but in some ways the affected area is much larger,” Lippman said. “In 9/11, the immediate ‘frozen zone’ was identifiable. But here you have it all across the metropolitan area. You have this total failure of transportation, in electricity, in so many different areas that it is traumatic in a different way. The loss of life was so overwhelming on 9/11 and the act was so heinous that it is very different than an act of nature. But I think both are traumatic in their own ways.”

Tags: ,

4 Responses Leave a comment

  • Shane Bryant 2012.11.2 at 00:21 | Quote

    Nice to see you are okay. Although I grew up in Florida (a.k.a. the Hurricane State), I’ve never experienced anything like the chaos the people of New York are now experiencing. I hope things get back to normal soon.

  • Old Geezer 2012.11.2 at 08:34 | Quote

    Are you running on Sunday? What are your thoughts on the postpone/cancel controversy?

  • Eric Turkewitz 2012.11.2 at 08:55 | Quote

    OG:

    I cancelled due to an injury (muscle pull, not serious). I agree it should go forward so long as the police say they have enough resources to cover the event.

    The race is a big shot in the city’s economic arm, it raises 10s of millions for charity, and it is an unparalleled civic event.

  • Jim 2012.11.5 at 13:41 | Quote

    Eric, does this impact the time frame for filing a notice of claim? It doesn’t appear that the order affects GMU-50e…

Comments are closed.


The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.