Enough with the LinkedIn Endorsements!

linkedin_log0They come poring in to my email these days — LinkedIn endorsements. And I still can’t figure out why this is happening.

When I joined LinkedIn a couple years back it was to see what this other social network was and post my bio in case anyone using the service wanted to find me. I assumed it was a pretty pointless exercise since I already have a pretty good web footprint, but hey, you never know if someone is going to invent a better toaster. Twitter, after all, supplanted my RSS feed.

In doing so, I also accepted connections from other lawyers since this was just a simple click and it cost me almost no time. As long as I didn’t smell a marketeer that was going to follow-up with email solicitations, it didn’t seem to matter much to me.

But LinkedIn wasn’t, as far as I could tell, a better toaster, and it just seemed to be yet another gathering point for people to connect with others, and yet another way to spend time that could be better spent with doing actual work, or time with family.

My wife, a recruiter for dot com companies, loves the site as it enables her to look for people with certain attributes to fill positions. For job hunters, it can be valuable. But for a practicing lawyer to be spending time there?

Every so often I noodled around with it, and joined a legal blogging group that I diligently checked once or twice a year. That was about it.

LinkedIn EndorsementsAnd then started the flood of people endorsing me. Friends, adversaries and strangers.  A first I was flattered. I’m easy that way.

But I was endorsed for legal practice areas sometimes, in areas where I don’t even practice.

I endorsed a few people back if I knew them and was familiar with their skills, but the problem is that the endorsements came in like a flood, sometimes multiple ones from the same person, but with new practice areas noted. And each time I tried to endorse someone back, in took me several minutes just to do it right, me not being the type to willy-nilly endorse people.

My brain finally started to fire properly and I belatedly realized that this endorsement racket is, for most, a massive self-congratulatory pat on the back to each other that doesn’t amount to a hill of beans. Sort of like a contest to see who can collect the most Twitter followers.

I’ve stopped, at least for now, because I can’t answer the one big question: What the hell is the point? It isn’t as if a potential personal injury client is going to go to LinkedIn to find an attorney. And even if they were already deeply involved with LinkedIn, and used the service on some regular basis, it isn’t as if such a person would be duped by the endorsement scam.

Would some other attorney find me and refer a case? Maybe. But they are also unlikely to be duped by the endorsement scam. They would see my bio, and they would ask around.

So I’ve stopped what I see as a pointless charade.

If folks want to use LinkedIn in order to find people connected in their particular industry, as my wife does, I get it. If I were looking for new employment, I would most definitely have my bio on that site.

But running around “endorsing” people doesn’t seem like time well spent.


8 Responses Leave a comment

  • Noah Kovacs 2013.8.29 at 15:11 | Quote

    I totally get what you’re saying regarding linkedIn. People are abusing it to say the least. What really gets me is people from other countries sending you request saying you’ve done work together when you obviously haven’t. I think organic endorsements are great and add real value but like anything, if it gets spammy and it will be obvious when it is..it looses the credibility and value all together. Thank you for sharing this Eric.

  • Terry Dawson 2013.8.30 at 04:33 | Quote

    “When I joined LinkedIn a couple years back it was to see what this other social network was and post my bio in case anyone using the service wanted to find me”

    Late to the party. Not really sure you “get” linkedin – sounds like your wife does though.

    “I also accepted connections from other lawyers since this was just a simple click and it cost me almost no time.”

    “And each time I tried to endorse someone back, in took me several minutes just to do it right”
    Really? It’s not particularly complicated.

    You get out of linkedin what you put it. Accept invites from people you don’t know then you’ll probably get meaningless endorsements.

    If I were looking for a lawyer, and saw they had lots of endorsements for a very specific skill, particularly if some of those endorsements were from people I trusted, that would boost their credentials in my eyes. It wouldn’t be the only factor I’d use to select a lawyer, but it would be important.

  • Dave Baxter 2013.8.30 at 05:48 | Quote

    Yeah, endorsements on LinkedIn are plain weird. Especially when they’re skills you’re only broadly connected to. “Recommendations” seems to have kept their purpose, though, probably because people actually have to take time writing out a full personal recommendation. Lessons from the internet number whatever: the content with the most meaning is original content, composed from scratch.

  • Eric Turkewitz 2013.8.30 at 07:53 | Quote

    Really? It’s not particularly complicated.

    True, it is quite easy if you do it willy-nilly, not really caring too much about who you are endorsing for what. And therein lies the problem — doing it is so easy that the endorsements lack meaning.

    Doing it with a bit of care, however, actually takes time.

    And that is not time well spent since anyone that would use LinkedIn to find a lawyer — precious few I might add — would know how worthless the endorsements are.

    One other point, which I didn’t put in the post, is that LinkedIn appeals to higher demographics than other social media since its strength is professional relationships. These types of people are the most likely to know a lawyer from whom to get advice (or one who could steer you in the right direction) and the least likely to use LinkedIn to go searching.

    Conclusion: Spending time on this folly is just that. Folly.

  • Bob Ambrogi 2013.8.31 at 16:56 | Quote

    Eric – See also my post about whether LinkedIn endorsements cross legal ethics lines: http://www.lawsitesblog.com/2013/05/do-linkedin-endorsements-violate-legal-ethics.html

  • Hans Poppe 2013.9.1 at 00:18 | Quote

    Excellent points. I’ve been wondering the same thing.

  • LTMG 2013.9.3 at 00:11 | Quote

    I’m waiting to be endorsed for Endorsements.

  • Adam Kielich 2013.9.14 at 14:00 | Quote

    I understand LinkedIn as a sort of virtual resume but I can’t figure out why I need it when I have facebook for my friends/acquaintances/relatives and my website for professional information. Otherwise, LinkedIn just feels like an opportunity for strangers to beg me for an endorsement or marketers to send me trash marketing. There’s a few small networking groups that are useful from time to time but every month it seems like another useful group is devoured by marketers and rendered useless.

Comments are closed.

The New York Personal Injury Law Blog is sponsored by its creator, Eric Turkewitz of The Turkewitz Law Firm. The blog might be considered a form of attorney advertising in accordance with New York rules going into effect February 1, 2007 (22 NYCRR 1200.1, et. seq.) As of July 14, 2008, Law.com became an advertiser, as you can see in the sidebar. Law.com does not control the editorial content of the blog in any way.

Throughout the blog as it develops, you may see examples of cases we have handled, or cases from others, that are used for illustrative purposes. Since all cases are different, and legal authority may change from year to year, it is important to remember that prior results in any particular case do not guarantee or predict similar outcomes with respect to any future matter, including yours, in which any lawyer or law firm may be retained.

Some of the commentary may be become outdated. Some might be a minority opinion, or simply wrong. No reader should consider this site (or any other) to be authoritative, and if a legal issue is presented, the reader should contact an attorney of his or her own choosing for advice.

Finally, we are not responsible for the comments of others that may be added to this site.